Output interpretation
Posted on
Juanda
Joined: 05/18/2016
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| saturatedmodel.jpg | 153.75 KB |
| MOEOLO-INN-PERF(SAT).R | 2.31 KB |
| dataset155.txt | 7.19 KB |
Forums
Dear Mike,
I fitted a saturated path model over 3 exogenous variables (MO, EO, LO), 1 mediator (INN) and 1 response variable (PERF), but the results are contradictory.
I want to determine the nature of the mediation role of INN (full mediation or partial mediation).
The analysis through direct effects are no consistent with the indirect effects.
I attach the dataset and the commands in R.
Is the model well specified? How can I interpret this output?
Thanks in advance for your attention, I really appreciate your opinion.
Dear Juan, The syntax and
Dear Juan,
The syntax and output look fine.
The direct and indirect effects do not need to be consistent. This is a standard mediation model. You may refer to the relevant books and papers on this topic.
Mike
Log in or register to post comments
In reply to Dear Juan, The syntax and by Mike Cheung
Confirm statement
Dear Mike,
Thanks for your prompt response.
JDR
Log in or register to post comments