Attachment | Size |
---|---|
saturatedmodel.jpg | 153.75 KB |
MOEOLO-INN-PERF(SAT).R | 2.31 KB |
dataset155.txt | 7.19 KB |
Dear Mike,
I fitted a saturated path model over 3 exogenous variables (MO, EO, LO), 1 mediator (INN) and 1 response variable (PERF), but the results are contradictory.
I want to determine the nature of the mediation role of INN (full mediation or partial mediation).
The analysis through direct effects are no consistent with the indirect effects.
I attach the dataset and the commands in R.
Is the model well specified? How can I interpret this output?
Thanks in advance for your attention, I really appreciate your opinion.
Dear Juan,
The syntax and output look fine.
The direct and indirect effects do not need to be consistent. This is a standard mediation model. You may refer to the relevant books and papers on this topic.
Mike
Dear Mike,
Thanks for your prompt response.
JDR