Converting to and from OpenMx
twoertwein
Joined: 12/11/2019
lavaan multi-level SEM in OpenMX
Lavaan's log-likelihood is -23309.87 but with the following OpenMx code I get only -26495.56. I have also tried to use the estimated parameters from lavaan as fixed parameters in the OpenMx model - the log-likelihood gets even worse then. I assume that the model structure in OpenMx is not the same as the structure model in lavaan.
- Read more about lavaan multi-level SEM in OpenMX
- 11 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
0avasns
Joined: 12/09/2010
One standardized value does not match Mplus/lavaan
amr438
Joined: 03/09/2016
Converting ClassicMx script to OpenMx
I am currently trying to recreate ClassicMx script for an ECOT model into OpenMx and I am coming across an error that I am not sure how to solve.
When I run the model I get the following error:
Error: The following error occurred while evaluating the subexpression 'solve(ecot.matF %*% solve(ecot.matI - ecot.matA) %*% ecot.matM %*% ecot.matU)' during the evaluation of 'MZtoss.expMeanMZtoss' in model 'modelECOT' : 'a' (4 x 1) must be square
I have attached the ClassicMX code and OpenMx code.
- Read more about Converting ClassicMx script to OpenMx
- 1 comment
- Log in or register to post comments
tbates
Joined: 07/31/2009
convert lavaan to OpenMx
It will often be easiest to simply recreate your model in OpenMx or to use umx’s umxRAM function. This will also lead to to nicer code, taking advantage of OpenMx’s features.
For automated translation of lavaan syntax into OpenMx, metaSEM provides the lavaan2RAM function.
- Read more about convert lavaan to OpenMx
- Log in or register to post comments
CarolKan
Joined: 04/17/2014
Q
- Read more about Q
- 6 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
Robert Long
Joined: 02/22/2013
Converting a Stata -sem- path model
I am trying to convert a simple path model from Stata. In Stata I use
clear all
ssd init EE DR RO SE
ssd set observations 321
ssd set sd 15.23 10.15 16.27 1.01
ssd set correlations ///
1 \ ///
0.25 1 \ ///
0.78 0.21 1 \ ///
-0.47 -0.27 -0.35 1
sem (SE -> EE) (EE -> DR) (EE -> RO) (DR -> RO), nocapslatent
This generates the following output
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| OIM
| Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
- Read more about Converting a Stata -sem- path model
- 3 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
HanOud
Joined: 12/20/2009
THard=-n
Thanks for any answer in advance,
Han Oud
- Read more about THard=-n
- 6 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
suzannejak
Joined: 01/06/2010
Wrong algebra?
I keep finding differences between my Mx and OpenMx analysis and I think I must have made a mistake in translating the following algebra:
in Mx:
G = (Y-X)@(A.((A.A)*(V-J))) + X@(A.((U-I)*(A.A)));
in OpenMx (wrong?):
algebraG = mxAlgebra(expression = (Y-X) %x% (A*((A*A)%*%(V-J))) + X %x% (A * ((U-I)%*%(A*A))), name = "G")
- Read more about Wrong algebra?
- 5 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
mspiegel
Joined: 07/31/2009
converting Mx scripts
- Read more about converting Mx scripts
- 3 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
jssteele
Joined: 10/11/2009
A Perl based parser for Mplus syntax
UPDATE:
Version 0.3b available
UPDATE:
Newest version 0.2b handles PON and PWITH syntax.
UPDATE:
I have attached a newer version of the .pm file. I would welcome suggestions if anyone has some.
UPDATE:
This is a work in progress and is in need of some more work currently. Use at your own risk... you have been warned. :)
====original message below====
Greetings again,
- Read more about A Perl based parser for Mplus syntax
- 2 comments
- Log in or register to post comments