quiet failure without error message
How can I troubleshoot when there is no eror message?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> summary(FactorConfigFIout)
data:
$`Moderated FI Model.data`
The final iterate satisfies the optimality conditions to the accuracy requested, but the sequence of iterates has not yet converged. NPSOL was terminated because no further improvement could be made in the merit function (Mx status GREEN).
free parameters:
name matrix row col Estimate Std.Error
1 l1 A y1 F1 1.44802605 0.05510917
2 l2 A y2 F1 1.02700153 0.03129520
3 l3 A y3 F1 1.26738868 0.04337198
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 u1 S y1 y1 2.88522312 0.12568855
12 u2 S y2 y2 0.36705920 0.04068190
13 u3 S y3 y3 1.74437864 0.08607359
14 i1 M 1 y1 6.32458998 0.05755780
15 i2 M 1 y2 7.73262409 0.02995602
16 i3 M 1 y3 6.28814298 0.04359621
17
18
19
observed statistics: 6143
estimated parameters: 19
degrees of freedom: 6124
-2 log likelihood: 22072.42
saturated -2 log likelihood: NA
number of observations: 2354
chi-square: NA
p: NA
AIC (Mx): 9824.423
BIC (Mx): -12736.76
adjusted BIC:
RMSEA: NA
timestamp: 2010-12-02 14:06:20
frontend time: 0.3740001 secs
backend time: 33.819 secs
independent submodels time: 0 secs
wall clock time: 34.193 secs
cpu time: 34.193 secs
openmx version number: 1.0.3-1505
> FactorWeakFI <- mxModel(FactorConfigFI,
+
+ name="FactorWeakFI",
+ mxPath(from=c(latentsY), to=dummies, arrows=1, free=FALSE, values=0),
+ mxData(vmFrame, type="raw")
+ )
>
> FactorWeakFIout <- mxRun(FactorWeakFI)
Running FactorWeakFI
> summary(FactorWeakFI)
observed statistics: 0
estimated parameters: 0
degrees of freedom: 0
-2 log likelihood: NA
saturated -2 log likelihood: NA
number of observations: 0
chi-square: NA
p: NA
AIC (Mx): NA
BIC (Mx): NA
adjusted BIC:
RMSEA: NA
timestamp: NULL
frontend time: NULL
backend time: NULL
independent submodels time: NULL
wall clock time: NULL
cpu time: NULL
openmx version number: NULL
There seems to be a typo in
summary(FactorWeakFIout)
Log in or register to post comments
In reply to There seems to be a typo in by tbrick
but of course! thanks. the
the error was in the script I started with, and I just assumed my data was resposible. I should have looked at the output of the script I was given more closely.
The next statement is an omxCompare(), wich had the correct name and the comparison worked. I don;t think anybody ever looked too close at the previous summary, because the comparison was of interest.
... still lots of thanks
Log in or register to post comments