FIML Estimation
Posted on
siti nur azizah
Joined: 03/12/2014
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| kodingan DATA BARU YogyaPabar.txt | 4.8 KB |
Forums
I want to ask you.
actually, I have a problem with my data. My new data is incomplete (missing data). I read on the web if no data is lost then using FIML function, but I am confused what to put where and what. I have tried but I always fail. please help me.
other than that, is there any basis we determine the value? I tried to try to change the value of 0.25-1 and outcome affect the output Standard error of estimate.
thank you.
Hi, To use FIML, simply
Hi,
To use FIML, simply create a model with raw data.
aModel <- mxModel(name="Example with FIML",
mxData(aRawDataSet, type="raw"),
# other paths, matrices, and algebras
)
Cheers,
Mike Hunter
Log in or register to post comments
In reply to Hi, To use FIML, simply by mhunter
Great. Thank You for your
Great. Thank You for your answer. it's a helpful.
Log in or register to post comments
example FIML model
OpenMx works well with missing data using FIML as you say.
All you need to do is include your raw data in the mxData() line, and use the FIML objective.
Here's an example:
data(myFADataRaw, package="OpenMx")
manifests = names(myFADataRaw)
myFADataRaw = myFADataRaw[, manifests]
latents = c("G")
m1 <- mxModel("m1", type="RAM",
manifestVars = manifests,
latentVars = latents,
# Factor loadings
mxPath(from = latents, to = manifests),
# residuals and variances
mxPath(from = manifests, arrows = 2), # manifest residuals
mxPath(from = latents, arrows = 2, free = F, values = 1), # latents fixed@1
mxPath(from = c("x1", "x2"), to = "x3", arrows = 1), # manifest causes
mxPath(from = "one", to = manifests, arrows = 1), # manifest means
mxData(myFADataRaw, type = "raw")
)
m1 = umxRun(m1, setLabels = T, setStart = T)
umxSummary(m1)
Log in or register to post comments