General SEM Discussions

OpenMx for just optimization
I'm very impressed with what I've read and am excited about the prospect of using it for my project. However, I'm not yet convinced it will help me do what I need and whether it is the right package for this work.
- Read more about OpenMx for just optimization
- 5 comments
- Log in or register to post comments

Positive Log-likelihood
When fitting a univariate model with continuous moderator, I keep getting positive log-likelihood (and naturally negative -2LL). The main variable is log transformed BMI. As far as I understand this is caused due to its small SD (SD=0.13 with mean=3.13). I saw in one thread (http://openmx.psyc.virginia.edu/thread/329) that it is recommended to avoid using variables with small variance. Would it be advised to use original BMI variable instead of log-transformed despite its skewness (1.22 vs 0.62 of the log-transformed)?
- Read more about Positive Log-likelihood
- 3 comments
- Log in or register to post comments

procedures (SEM)
- Read more about procedures (SEM)
- 4 comments
- Log in or register to post comments

Using Correlation Matrices v. Raw Data as Input

Survival model redux.
- Read more about Survival model redux.
- 1 comment
- Log in or register to post comments

Tutorial Model
I've been working through Dorothy Bishop's tutorial, linked from this website here:
http://openmx.psyc.virginia.edu/wiki/ideas-simplified-manual-beginners-smb
or can be found in online form on her blog here:
http://dbtemp.blogspot.co.uk/2011/08/structural-equation-modeling-in-openmx.html
I found I was getting NaN std errors (see the comments at the bottom of the blog link above for the full discussion - I've paraphrased and extended the comments there in the question below).
Dorothy Bishop kindly replied with some suggestions, but thought that I should ask on this forum.
- Read more about Tutorial Model
- Log in or register to post comments

Relative importance of attributes in a structural model
I have run a structural model and am interested in deriving relative importance for each of the attributes that drive interest in my ultimate dependent variable. Is this possible to do?
Below is the model summary -
ATT1, ATT2, ATT3, ATT4 formed a latent variables L1
ATT5, ATT6, ATT7, ATT8 formed a latent variables L2
L1 and L2 are correlated and are predictors of DEP
How can I find out the contribution of ATT1 to ATT8 in predicting DEP? Please let me know. Thanks in advance for your help.

Assumptions for SEM
I looked trough the two papers indicated by citation('OpenMx') and could not find the assumptions on the data (indicators). Do they need to be centered around Zero and/or have variance of One? Where is that written down? I found literature with and without the above mentioned assumptions.
Thanks in advance!
- Read more about Assumptions for SEM
- 3 comments
- Log in or register to post comments

Reliability of indicators
is there a way to measure the reliability of the indicators in a SEM?
Is it correct to standardise the run model by the function standardizeRAM(model) and computing the squares of the path coefficients/factor loadings (squared multiple correlation)?
I found the function standardizeRAM(model) here: http://openmx.psyc.virginia.edu/thread/1095
Thanks in advance!
- Read more about Reliability of indicators
- 4 comments
- Log in or register to post comments

Partial Correlation Model not Working?
multiRegModelPr2 <- mxModel("Preacher 2",
type="RAM",
mxData(
observed=data,
type="raw"
),
manifestVars=c("x", "y", "z"),
latentVars = c("z1", "z2", "z3"),
# variance paths
mxPath(
from=c("x", "y", "z", "z1", "z2", "z3"),
arrows=2,
free=c(T,T,T,F,F,F),
values = c(.5, .5, .5, 1, 1, 1),
labels=c("d1", "d2", "d3", NA, NA, NA)
),
# covariance of x and z
mxPath(
- Read more about Partial Correlation Model not Working?
- 4 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 8
- Next page