General SEM Discussions

Posted on
Picture of user. ebejer Joined: 03/18/2010

Generating fake data

Hi,

I have some data that I want to replicate (to maintain realistic relationships between the variables). I have copied the script that Ryne posted for everyone's convenience, and I was able to generate one data set. However the data I want does contain factors (unordered?), so it seems to me I need to use the second half of the script to retain the information that they have.

Posted on
No user picture. linx Joined: 11/09/2010

Non Linear Modeling

Dear all:

I am new to OpenMx. I have a question non-linear modeling in openMx. I have been trying to utilize a framework that observed measurement variables determine latent variable, and latent variables impact observed outcome variable. The thing is that the way latent variables impact outcome variable is non linear. Is there a way to modify the mxPath command to allow nonlinear estimations?

Thanks!

-Lin

Posted on
Picture of user. ebejer Joined: 03/18/2010
Posted on
Picture of user. ebejer Joined: 03/18/2010

Interpreting output

Hi,

I have just been familiarising myself with the running of a two latent factor model with 18 manifest variables. I ran the same data using path and matrix specification, and in SPSS. The output for the factor loadings (not means) differed across all analyses and I am really only familiar with SPSS output, where the loading of the latent variable is automatically split across the two latent factors for each variable. I'm a bit confused ..... Can someone pleease give me some tips on interpreting the output for OpenMx?

Kind regards,
J

Posted on
Picture of user. mhunter Joined: 07/31/2009

Sanity Check: Model Makes Sense?

Hi All,

I've been working with a model that I thought made perfect sense, but then someone made a suggestion to change the model into one that I think is both meaningless and impossible. I've attached diagrams of both the original (sensible0.pdf) and the suggested modification (sensible1.pdf).

The problem I see with something like sensible1 is that nothing defines the latent variable L. Put another way, there is no measurement model for L. Am I missing something, or is sensible1 inestimable?

Posted on
No user picture. garylewis Joined: 05/05/2010

Modeling semi-continuous data (ceiling effects)

Hi all,
Is there a recommended approach to modeling twin data in openmx where the variables are semi-continuous/skewed such that they are exhibiting a ceiling effect? Alternative estimation method perhaps, or is ML robust enough to such violations?

Posted on
Picture of user. mhunter Joined: 07/31/2009

OpenMx can now estimate Hidden Markov Models

Hi All,

Just thought I'd post the headline. I'll post again once I clean up my example script.

Posted on
No user picture. fife Joined: 07/01/2010

Correlating Errors with a Latent Variable

I know it's a strange model, but what I'm trying to do is model a regular old unidimensional factor analysis, with the exception that the uniquenesses are all correlated with the factor. Here's how i've tried to specify my model:

man = paste(rep("Item", times=20), seq(1:20), sep="")
errors = paste(rep("e", times=20), seq(1:20), sep="")
lat=c("F1", errors)
loadings=mxPath(from=lat[1], to=man, arrows=1, values=.5, free=T)
fVar = mxPath(from=lat[1], arrows=2, free=F, values=.5, labels="D")
uniq = mxPath(from=lat[2:21], to=man, arrows=1, free=T, values=.5)

Posted on
No user picture. khan Joined: 06/05/2010

Beta is Minus one

Hi everyone,

I have one problem and this from will be helpful.

I am using PLS for analyzing my data, i have created product terms for testing moderating effect. But one of the interaction term (moderating effect) gives me -1.25 path coefficient. Can anybody help where is the problem? I double checked the data all the interaction terms are fine.

Thank you.

Posted on
Picture of user. rabil Joined: 01/14/2010

Strange result I can't explain

Subjects have 5 measures on each eye. DA is an area measurement and the C's are counts of area size categores. The C's can be linearly combined to closely estimate DA. The idea is that DA and the C's are indicators of the true area.