General SEM Discussions

Generating fake data
Hi,
I have some data that I want to replicate (to maintain realistic relationships between the variables). I have copied the script that Ryne posted for everyone's convenience, and I was able to generate one data set. However the data I want does contain factors (unordered?), so it seems to me I need to use the second half of the script to retain the information that they have.
- Read more about Generating fake data
- 2 comments
- Log in or register to post comments

Non Linear Modeling
Dear all:
I am new to OpenMx. I have a question non-linear modeling in openMx. I have been trying to utilize a framework that observed measurement variables determine latent variable, and latent variables impact observed outcome variable. The thing is that the way latent variables impact outcome variable is non linear. Is there a way to modify the mxPath command to allow nonlinear estimations?
Thanks!
-Lin
- Read more about Non Linear Modeling
- 8 comments
- Log in or register to post comments

matrix vs path specification
Hi,
- Read more about matrix vs path specification
- 9 comments
- Log in or register to post comments

Interpreting output
Hi,
I have just been familiarising myself with the running of a two latent factor model with 18 manifest variables. I ran the same data using path and matrix specification, and in SPSS. The output for the factor loadings (not means) differed across all analyses and I am really only familiar with SPSS output, where the loading of the latent variable is automatically split across the two latent factors for each variable. I'm a bit confused ..... Can someone pleease give me some tips on interpreting the output for OpenMx?
Kind regards,
J
- Read more about Interpreting output
- 7 comments
- Log in or register to post comments

Sanity Check: Model Makes Sense?
Hi All,
I've been working with a model that I thought made perfect sense, but then someone made a suggestion to change the model into one that I think is both meaningless and impossible. I've attached diagrams of both the original (sensible0.pdf) and the suggested modification (sensible1.pdf).
The problem I see with something like sensible1 is that nothing defines the latent variable L. Put another way, there is no measurement model for L. Am I missing something, or is sensible1 inestimable?
- Read more about Sanity Check: Model Makes Sense?
- 3 comments
- Log in or register to post comments

Modeling semi-continuous data (ceiling effects)
Hi all,
Is there a recommended approach to modeling twin data in openmx where the variables are semi-continuous/skewed such that they are exhibiting a ceiling effect? Alternative estimation method perhaps, or is ML robust enough to such violations?

OpenMx can now estimate Hidden Markov Models
Hi All,
Just thought I'd post the headline. I'll post again once I clean up my example script.
- Read more about OpenMx can now estimate Hidden Markov Models
- Log in or register to post comments

Correlating Errors with a Latent Variable
I know it's a strange model, but what I'm trying to do is model a regular old unidimensional factor analysis, with the exception that the uniquenesses are all correlated with the factor. Here's how i've tried to specify my model:
man = paste(rep("Item", times=20), seq(1:20), sep="")
errors = paste(rep("e", times=20), seq(1:20), sep="")
lat=c("F1", errors)
loadings=mxPath(from=lat[1], to=man, arrows=1, values=.5, free=T)
fVar = mxPath(from=lat[1], arrows=2, free=F, values=.5, labels="D")
uniq = mxPath(from=lat[2:21], to=man, arrows=1, free=T, values=.5)
- Read more about Correlating Errors with a Latent Variable
- 1 comment
- Log in or register to post comments

Beta is Minus one
Hi everyone,
I have one problem and this from will be helpful.
I am using PLS for analyzing my data, i have created product terms for testing moderating effect. But one of the interaction term (moderating effect) gives me -1.25 path coefficient. Can anybody help where is the problem? I double checked the data all the interaction terms are fine.
Thank you.
- Read more about Beta is Minus one
- 3 comments
- Log in or register to post comments

Strange result I can't explain
Subjects have 5 measures on each eye. DA is an area measurement and the C's are counts of area size categores. The C's can be linearly combined to closely estimate DA. The idea is that DA and the C's are indicators of the true area.
- Read more about Strange result I can't explain
- 4 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 11
- Next page