Behavioral Genetics Models
CI is confusing
- Read more about CI is confusing
- 9 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
ACE with moderator-help interpreting results
1. Are the estimates of T,U,V the moderated components? (often denoted by betas)
2. If the estimate for a certain parameter is not zero, yet the CI contains zero- does this imply that this component is not significant?
- Read more about ACE with moderator-help interpreting results
- 4 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
Error in output
Error found in rectangular data; record number 1 :
1004 -999 -999 -999 -999 -999
We have a problem whose error code is 176
and which I ran across at line number 38
of your input script
RE FILE=AGE11DATA.DAT
~~~
An error has occurred while reading a rectangular file
Make sure that you *don't* have a FORMAT at the beginning
- Read more about Error in output
- 7 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
Difference between optimizers
Here is the sat part, if it helps:
#sat model, rmz, rdz:
PathMZ <- mxMatrix("Lower",nrow = 2,ncol = 2,free = TRUE,values=starting_value_pathcoeff,name = "PathMZ")#cholesky for pos definitness
- Read more about Difference between optimizers
- 3 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
direct comparison between traits' heritability with no raw data
I am trying to conduct a meta-analysis on the heritability of two traits that are different, yet related (I found six studies in which the twins were measured in both traits).
From what I know, in order to directly compare between the two traits heritability, I need to enter them in the same model, and for that, I need either the raw data or the full correlation matrix (and I have neither).
Multivariate ACE Vs. Multilevel Model
I'm trying to understand the relationship between multivariate ACE models (e.g., Cholesky model fit to two phenotypes) and multilevel behavior genetic models. Is there a formal comparison somewhere?
My sense is that multivariate ACE models conflate within and between pair variance. A and C could capture within and between effects while E captures the within pair effects. E will map right onto the within pair effect in the multilevel model (MLM). Is all this correct?
- Read more about Multivariate ACE Vs. Multilevel Model
- 8 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
nuclear twin family design in OpenMx
I am trying to fix a Nuclear Twin Family model in OpenMx.
Genetic and environmental parameter estimates in my model are obtained from four pieces of information, the covariance between MZ twins, the covariance between DZ twins and the covariance between parents and the covariance between parents and children.
- Read more about nuclear twin family design in OpenMx
- 2 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
Assumptions bivariate ACE twin model
I am planning to do bivariate ACE modelling using IQ and brain imaging derived measures and I would be very grateful if you could help me answer a few questions regarding the general assumptions for this type of modelling.
- Read more about Assumptions bivariate ACE twin model
- 2 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
Saturated vs ACE model- different correlations
I am trying to fit a univariate model.
I fitted the saturated model first and I got correlations of 0.64 and 0.34 for MZ and DZ respectively.
However, when I fitted the ACE model, I got these results:
A=0.04
C=0.52
E=0.44
So, I decided to check the correlations from the ACE model and I got 0.56 and 0.54 for MZ and DZ respectively.
I know that correlations may change from the ACE to the saturated model. However, these differences are huge.
what are the meanings of definition variables in SEM in twin studies
For instance, I want to estimate the heritability of smoking( binary variable) and age is added to adjust the threshold.
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 9
- Next page