# direct comparison between traits' heritability with no raw data

2 posts / 0 new
Offline
Joined: 07/21/2017 - 13:13
direct comparison between traits' heritability with no raw data

Dear forum
I am trying to conduct a meta-analysis on the heritability of two traits that are different, yet related (I found six studies in which the twins were measured in both traits).

From what I know, in order to directly compare between the two traits heritability, I need to enter them in the same model, and for that, I need either the raw data or the full correlation matrix (and I have neither).

I would like to ask: Does anyone know a way to perform a direct statistical comparison between the heritability estimates of these traits, given that I only have information about the cross-twin-within-traits correlations, but not about the cross-twin-cross-trait correlations (e.g., the correlation between one twin 1 in trait 1 and the second twin in trait 2, separately for MZ and DZ twins)? Is a descriptive comparison between the heritability estimates of the traits the only option?

Thank you very much for your help,
Lior

Offline
Joined: 01/30/2014 - 19:39
Given that you are just

Given that you are just working with sum-score correlations, your best approach is probably to estimate heritability using Falconer’s formula as done here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8faa/f538ad7f21f084b9535cdb31824c11cc2a1d.pdf

So the difference in heritabilities would be 2*(rM1 - rM2 - rD1 +rD2). Be sure to read up on the limitations and assumptions of the Falconer formula.

Then to calculate the standard error for this value, that’s 2sqrt(Var_rM1 + Var_rM2 -2Cov_rM1rM2 + Var_rD1 + Var_rD2 -2*Cov_rD1rD2)

The issue, as you note, is that the covariance terms require estimates of not only the cross-twin within-trait correlations but also the within-twin within-trait and cross-twin cross-trait correlations. See Equations. 6: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01466219922031239?casa_token=oACj12LtQeAAAAAA:SFVBEqelbBixTa1SC1_bqWn7GNzUJUziW75UCOuOKxSpqhZnKvDcLz-BNsuwsrTCnslrW-IaTTo

Given that this is only being used to calculate a standard error and not the point estimate, it may be reasonable to estimate a plausible value. For example rXtwinXtrait ≈ rWtwinXtrait * mean(rXtwinWtrait1, rXtwinWtrait2). You could also examine a few larger or smaller correlation estimates to illustrate potential implications of this assumption on SE width.