Violation of assumption of equal variances MZ and DZ

2 posts / 0 new

Last post

Thu, 07/18/2013 - 20:54

koak

Offline

Joined: 05/10/2012 - 23:13

Violation of assumption of equal variances MZ and DZ

Hello

My data of cognitive measures is indicating a number of violations of the assumptions of the twin model. I have transformed the data using z scores and still find that MZ and DZ variances are different. Any ideas on how I should proceed, including how to adjust the script in the ACE/ADE model to deal with this?

Many thanks

Karen

Tue, 08/06/2013 - 15:00

neale

Offline

Joined: 07/31/2009 - 15:14

Careful with the measures, but here's how

Essentially, you take the twin expectations and pre & post multiply by a matrix with causal paths between the twins in it. So if you had

# Algebra for expected variance/covariance matrix in MZ
expCovMZ <- mxAlgebra(name = "expCovMZ",
                      expression = rbind (cbind(A+C+E, A+C),
                                          cbind(A+C,   A+C+E)))

It might become

matI  <- mxMatrix(name= "I", type="Iden", nrow = nv, ncol = nv)
matB <- mxMatrix(name= "B", type="Symm", free=c(F,T,T,F), labels=c(NA,b,b,NA), nrow = nv, ncol = nv)
# Algebra for expected Mean and Variance/Covariance Matrices in MZ & DZ twins
expCovMZ <- mxAlgebra(name = "expCovMZ",
                      expression = solve(I-B) %&% (rbind (cbind(A+C+E, A+C),
                                                          cbind(A+C,   A+C+E))))

You'd need to include the matI and matB objects in the mxModel() of course. And change the expCovDZ formula in exactly the same way (with the same I and B matrices).

Main menu

Navigation

You are here

Violation of assumption of equal variances MZ and DZ

Main menu

User login

Navigation

You are here

Violation of assumption of equal variances MZ and DZ

Search form